Skip to Main Content
  

LIBRARY

HON 499 Professor Moon's Library Instruction: P

2019 article US

Unintended consequences of cap-and-trade? Evidence from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative
Front cover image for Unintended consequences of cap-and-trade? Evidence from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative
Format:
Article
 
|
Peer-reviewed
Journal:
  • Energy Economics v80 (May 2019): 411-422
Held by Saint Leo University Cannon Memorial Library
View Description
Staff View:
MARC Record
ISSN:
  • 0140-9883
DOI:
Unique Identifier:
7990659733
Subjects:
Summary:
  • Cap-and-trade programs are designed to minimize the overall cost of pollution control by effectively allowing firms with low abatement costs to reduce emissions on behalf of those with higher abatement costs. However, these trades redistribute where emissions are generated, which has important implications for welfare because many pollutants have differential environmental and health impacts depending on where they are emitted. This paper compiles and analyzes a national data set of power plant emissions in order to assess how the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a carbon dioxide (CO<ce:inf loc="post">2</ce:inf>) cap-and-trade program involving nine states in the United States, impacts the emissions and damages from copollutants. Our results suggest that, in addition to achieving its goal of reducing CO<ce:inf loc="post">2</ce:inf>, the program has lowered the quantity of sulfur dioxide (SO<ce:inf loc="post">2</ce:inf>) emissions as well as associated damages in the policy region. However, two factors diminish the overall benefits from the program. First, within the RGGI region, trading shifts electricity generation to locations with higher marginal damages for SO<ce:inf loc="post">2</ce:inf>. Second, there is leakage of electricity generation and emissions to nearby states, although this latter effect is more modest than ex ante analyses predicted.
Notes:
  • fla Full-Length Article

ProQuest: Cap and trade or carbon credits AND emissions

Carbon emission reduction and profit distribution mechanism of construction supply chain with fairness concern and cap-and-trade

Jiang, Wen; Li, Yuan; Wu, Lanjun; Guo, Shiyue.PLoS One; San Francisco Vol. 14, Iss. 10,  (Oct 2019): e0224153. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0224153
Hide highlighting

Abstract

Fairness concern behavior is extremely common in social life, and many scholars are beginning to pay attention to this behavior. In this study, we investigate a two-echelon construction supply chain that consists of a general contractor and a subcontractor under cap-and-trade policy. We study the carbon emission reduction decisions and profit distribution mechanism in the construction supply chain with fairness concern and cap-and-trade. We use the Nash bargaining model to describe the fairness concerns of the construction supply chain members and use the co-opetition model to portray the profit distribution. We show that the fairness concern can impose an adverse influence on firms’ profits and decrease the magnitude of their carbon emission reductions. The subcontractor’s fairness concern causes greater losses to the construction supply chain’s profit. We further demonstrate the impact of fairness concern on the optimal decisions of the general contractor and the subcontractor through numerical analysis.

Cooperation AND Game

Books and eBooks

Articles - Environment Complete (EBSCO)

Game Theory and Environmental and Resource Economics-In Honour of Alfred Endres
Front cover image for Game Theory and Environmental and Resource Economics-In Honour of Alfred Endres
 
Title:
Game Theory and Environmental and Resource Economics-In Honour of Alfred Endres.
Authors:
Finus, Michael1 M.Finus@bath.ac.uk
Rundshagen, Bianca2
Source:
Environmental & Resource Economics. Dec2015, Vol. 62 Issue 4, p657-664. 8p.
Document Type:
Editorial
Subject Terms:
*Game theory
*Environmental economics
Company/Entity:
Universität Dortmund
Reviews & Products:
Environmental & Resource Economics (Periodical)
People:
Endres, Alfred
Author Affiliations:
1Department of Economics, University of Bath, Bath UK
2Institute of Economic Theory, University of Hagen, Hagen Germany
ISSN:
0924-6460
DOI:
10.1007/s10640-015-9955-4
Accession Number:
111455454
Database:
Environment Complete
 
Format:
Article
Publication year:
2015
 
|
Peer-reviewed
 
Journal:
  • Environmental and Resource Economics : The Official Journal of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists v62 n4 (201512): 657-664

other keywords to try

economic theory / mathematical models

environmental pollution control